(light music) – It's Pixel 4 time.
You know the drill.
Two sizes, three colors, two storage options, a million leaks, Googlesoftware, a really good camera, the whole Pixel deal.
It's high expectations, in other words.
The Pixel 4 is the flagship.
It's what Google says Android should be.
It also wants it to be likethe default Android phone.
Plus, this is the first yearthat Google is selling it on all four major US carriers.
So, we expect it to be good enough to really start selling in big volume.
But it's not selling in India.
I guess I didn't expect that.
Anyway, the point is, the Pixelis all about expectations.
You knew what to expectbecause everything leaked.
But now that it's here, can itlive up to those expectations especially when it starts at$799 and goes up to 1, 000? Let's get into it.
(light music) If we're talking about design, we just have to say itout loud at the start.
The Pixel 4 and the iPhone11 look kinda the same.
It's not just funny, it's almost uncanny.
They both have matte glass on some models and glossy on other models.
They both have the square camera bump.
They have some weird stuffat the top of their screens.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I see the differences.
Which one looks better toyou is a matter of taste.
The Pixel has these reallyobvious matte rails on the side.
It's not trying to hidethem or polish them away.
They're a main part ofthe look of this phone.
The matte rails makeit easier to grip too.
So far, I think the whole thing is a little bit less scratch-pronethan the Pixel 3 was.
I still love the colorpop on the power button.
I still think the blackone is the most boring one.
But you know what, they all look the same when you put 'em in a case anyway.
But before you put 'em in a case, take a second to appreciate that this is the best build quality Google has ever done on a phone.
Let's talk about the forehead.
It's funny-looking, andit's not symmetrical.
Samsung's hole-punch probablylooks a little bit better or a Notch would give youjust a little bit more screen to put status bar stuff, butthe Notch kinda looks doofy.
Can we just stop having these arguments? Unless you want stuff poppingout of the top of your phone with motors, maybe youdo, there's gonna be stuff at the top of your screen.
I think this looks okay.
I've gotten used to it.
(light music) Face unlock on the Pixel4 uses infrared projectors just like the iPhone.
Just like on the iPhone, it looks super wild when you point a realinfrared camera at it.
It has a decent field of view, but it's maybe not quiteas wide as the iPhone 11's.
The infrared means thatit works in the dark, and the system isdesigned to detect depth, so I wasn't able to trick it with a video or a photo of myself.
Maybe it could be trickedwith a mask though.
I don't know.
But if you're worried aboutsomebody making a life-like mask of you, maybe you shouldlook at other things that's going on with your life.
One thing you should knowis that it doesn't do the extra security step of making sure that you're looking at it.
That means if you're asleep, someone could just point it at you and unlock it becauseit works with your eyes closed.
So, only sleep around people you trust? I mean, I don't know.
That's just good life advice.
Anyway, once it's set up, it just works like you would expect it to.
It unlocks the phone, and it can also authenticate Google Pay or bank apps or whatever.
You just point your faceat it, and it unlocks.
It's fast, like really fast.
It's at least as fast as the iPhone.
I wanna talk about why it feels so fast.
But before I get there, let's talk about radar.
(light music) You've heard it, right? The Pixel 4 has a radar chip up top.
It's a Project Soli chip, but the feature is called motion sense.
It's the thing that I'm sureeverybody is going to say is a little flaky becauseit is a little flaky.
You can wave your hand leftor right to go back or forward if you use like a podcast are playing.
You can also wave yourhand to dismiss phone calls or snooze alarms.
It's the most prominent, most engaging feature of motion sense.
That's why it's a bummer thatit's the most flaky part.
There are times where it works every time.
I don't even have to think about it.
I'm just keeping my eyeson my computer or whatever and I'm flicking awaysongs that I don't want.
But then it doesn't workand I'm like what, also why.
There have been gestures on phones before, and nobody used them.
I think these gestures aregonna fare slightly better because they don't hit your battery life and you can just be alittle bit more flippant with your gestures when you use them.
But you know what, feelfree to be annoyed with them or just ignore them completely.
It's cool because even ifGoogle just took those gestures away entirely, I would still be glad that Soli is on this phone because of the othertwo things that it does.
The first is it detects your presence.
It just knows if you're nearby.
When you walk away, thealways on screen turns off.
It actually works really well.
The other thing that worksreally well is reach.
The phone knows if you're reaching for it, and it can do stuff when that happens.
So, if a ringtone or alarm is blaring, it quiets down whenyour hand gets near it, so you can look at the phone and then decide what you wannado, wave it away or whatever.
And if the screen is offand you reach for it, it lights up the face unlock cameras and starts looking for you.
That is part of the reasonwhy face unlock feels so fast.
It is a split second fasterthan the accelerometer method that the iPhone uses.
Google also defaults togoing straight into the phone instead of unlocking to the lock screen, which makes it feel even faster yet.
Oh by the way, if you want, you can keep the lock screen and then have to swipeup to get into the phone.
That's helpful if you use your phone mainly through notifications like I do.
Oh (laughs) also, there's Pokemon.
Yes, there's Pokemon wallpaper.
It is very cute.
It's also useful because youcan show weather conditions on top of the Pokemon.
You can wave them or you can pet at them.
Look, I have seen peoplesay that they would prefer an in-screen fingerprint sensor, and I am saying that faceunlock is unequivocally better.
Maybe in a year or two, they'll do both the fingerprint and face unlock, butI'm not asking for it.
(light music) Okay.
It's camera time, and Iknow what you're here for.
You wanna know whether or not the Pixel 4 took the best smartphone camera crown back from the iPhone 11 Pro.
Let me tell you why that's complicated.
Do you remember Nilay'sreview of the iPhone 11 Pro? He had to say that this phone right here, the Pixel 4 was right around the corner when he was judging that camera.
Now I'm reviewing thePixel, and I have to say that Apple's Deep Fusion'ssweater mode software upgrade is right around the corner.
So, I have to mention it.
It's practically diabolical, and it means that I can't make a definitive judgment right now.
Look, if you force meto pick one right now, I have to admit that the iPhone 11 Pro gives you much more versatility.
It has an ultra wide camerafor taking more phone photos, and it's way better at video.
But when it comes tostill photo photography and night mode and all of that, I do think there are a lot ofuseful things to talk about with these two cameras.
Plus, the Pixel has a few new features that we need to talk about, especially now that it hasa second telephoto lens.
Let's just look at some photos.
Here's a shot of Will, our creative director.
It's in very dim light.
This kind of tells the whole story.
The iPhone still trendstowards yellow tones while the Pixel is a little bit bluer.
The Pixel has a look.
Even though it's slightlywarmer and less contrasty than the last Pixel, it'sstill much more dramatic than the iPhone.
Apple does sharpen a little bit more, and it does maintain alittle bit more detail too, and more detail is good, but look, the color balance on the Pixel is smarter.
Google is analyzing theactual things in the image and guessing what thewhite balance should be based on what it sees whereApple is treating white balance a little bit more like atraditional camera would.
Next, let's talk about telephoto.
You see, Google chose a telephoto lens instead of an ultra wide lens or, you know, just givingus both for some reason.
But the main reason is, Google thinks that it can use its super zoom tech alongwith that second 2X lens to make zoom way better.
You know what? It's way better.
Look at the zoom on ourvideo producer Maria.
This is an 8X zoom.
The iPhone, it looks like it'sa cropped, it's noisy as hell while the Pixel is much more natural.
I mean, look at her jacket.
There's just so much more detail here.
So, what have we learned? The Pixel wins on zoom.
The iPhone gets detail better sometimes, but it is a little bit yellower.
The Pixel gets color balancebetter on the whole though, and it is more opinionated.
The Pixel has a look, and itconsistently gets that look.
What about night mode? You can kind of get eitherone to make a better photo.
It's a little bit of a crap shoot.
The iPhone's multipleframes use longer exposure, so it can get a little bitmore detail on still objects, but it messes up moving ones.
Just look at the cloud here on this photo.
The Pixel though, it justkeeps on doing its look.
In dim light, I thinkthey're a little bit closer to each other, but thePixel can get more detail.
It's the exposure time thing again.
The Pixel does more shortexposures with more math.
So, that means it's moreforgiving of shaky hands.
What about portrait mode? The Pixel uses the second telephoto lens to improve portrait mode, and it is better than it was before, but I still think it's not up to the iPhone's standard, which has a better gradual drop-off, and it also manages thehair better in this photo.
The other feature is astrophotography.
I just have to admit that Icouldn't get far enough away from light pollution to really test this.
(light music) Now the Pixel has a newfeature that lets you adjust the shadows of HDR+ along with the photo's overall brightness.
It's an extra slider basically.
Once you get how it works, you can take a photo from meh to really good.
Here are some photosfrom our podcast studio.
Both of these are from the Pixel, but the second one is the one I adjusted to look more accurate.
The blacks are just exactly right here.
I could do that because thePixel now shows a live preview of what the HDR+ result willbe right in the viewfinder.
It's really useful.
I do wish that it workedfor portrait mode.
There's only one selfie camera, which I'm kinda sad about 'cause I really did likethe ultra wide selfie camera last year, but Googledid set the field of view on this selfie camera to 90 degrees, which is a little bit widerthan usual, and that helps.
It's a good selfie camera because Google is good at software.
Once again, it gets thatvery consistent Pixel look.
Finally, and you knew this was coming, Google has some catchingup to do with video.
You can get good video.
Here's something that Becka, our video director shot, but you max out at 4K30 on the rear camera and 1080 on the front.
Apple and Samsung arejust way ahead of Google when it comes to video.
(light music) Have you noticed that I haven't mentioned the camera hardware specs, like, at all? I mean, here they are, butthey're not that different except for the existenceof the second lens.
Though I do hear that the sensor is a little bit less noisy this year.
Google is still using custom silicon, but now it's the Pixel Neural Core.
That's why you can see theHDR+ preview in the viewfinder.
It also speeds up a few other operations.
But the truth is, the wholestory now is software.
Apple caught up, which meansthat on a technical level, these cameras are basically equivalent, but they're making different choices about how they take and process photos.
You're dealing with different cameras having different aesthetics.
This is basically Nikon versus Canon, or, I don't know, Kodakversus Fuji for film nerds.
They both look really good, but they're definitely different.
Now will Apple's Deep Fusionchange that when it arrives? I kinda doubt it.
I played it within the beta a little, but until it actually comes out, it's just not fair foranybody to make that judgment.
What I can tell you isthat both phones are great, but the Pixel has a look, andit nails it almost every time while the iPhone is justa little bit more neutral.
I still think that my RX100camera takes better photos than either of them.
But the Pixel and theiPhone take better photos than any other phone.
The camera still shouldn'tdrive your purchase decision between these two phones, but if you care mainly about video, the Pixel 4 is probably not for you.
(light music) Once your phone hits acertain level of speed, once it feels more thanfast enough for most stuff, the most important performance spec is actually battery life.
You can have the fastest processor or the highest resolutionscreen, but it won't matter if your battery dies.
The battery life on the smallerPixel 4 is not great, Bob.
I've averaged like four hoursof screen time every day, which is not enough.
It's about what I wasgetting on the Pixel 3.
You could get through a whole day by using it less intensivelyand staying in dark mode, reducing screen brightness, and turning off the 90hertz display option.
All that is just a recipefor battery anxiety.
You shouldn't have tothink about all of that.
The 2, 800-milliamp battery is not enough.
Luckily with the Pixel 4 XL, you don't really have to worry as much.
It should go a full day for most people on the 3, 700-milliampbattery without having to do a whole bunch of tweaks.
But when it comes to actualperformance stuff, it's good.
But the main thing is Googlewent with six gigs of RAM, which means that apps aren'tclosing in the background on me as often, which thank God.
Anyway, look, there'sno getting around it.
You will find Androidphones with better specs.
That has just never beenwhat the Pixel is about.
It's about a cleaner, nicer overall experience.
Really, the Pixel 4 makes Android 10 just make way more sense to me now.
It's clear that the twothings were really designed for each other.
The best part of thatexperience is the screen.
(light music) It's really good with niceangles and good color, but it is a little bit too dim especially in bright sunlight.
Google also says that it canchange the color temperature based on the color inthe room that it's in kinda like Apple's True Tone.
Google calls it AmbientEQ, but you know what, it's so subtle that I can hardly see it.
But the main thing thatI love about this screen is the new smooth display featurethat lets the refresh rate go at 90 hertz.
You notice it the most when you scroll.
It just makes Android feelsmoother and less janky.
Google does say that itdrops down to 60 hertz when it's not needed to save battery life.
So, we got that going for us.
Now the other reason thatthe Pixel just feels faster and nicer is that it's way, way better at understanding spoken English.
Google loaded its entire modelfor understanding English into the Pixel Neural Core, so it doesn't have to ask the Internet to transcribeyour speech for you.
It speeds up everything.
It has me using the Google Assistant more because I trust that it'll go faster.
This seems like a small thing, but it really does changethe vibe of the phone.
So, when I need to talkto the Google Assistant, I just point my face at itto make sure it's unlocked and then I say hey, I'm notgonna set up your thing.
But before, I'd have to pick it up and hit the fingerprint sensor.
Now it's just so much better, except when it's not better because for some reason, ifyou have a G Suite account on your phone, even if it'snot the primary Google account for your Android phone, you don't get access to the new Assistant.
Hopefully, Google will fix this problem or at least explain whybecause it's super annoying.
Now that the Pixel 4is better at language, it can also do live caption, which makes captions on any video that you'rewatching on the phone.
It even works with thesound completely off.
Just remember to turn itoff when you're not using it because it can eat up battery life.
They also added a new record app, and it does live transcriptions.
It works pretty well.
There are a few missedwords here or there, but it's more than good enough for you to go back andsearch for that one thing that you're looking for.
(light music) The thing that you can't getfrom the leaks or the specs or even the earlyimpressions is what it's like to just use the Pixel 4.
You have this expectation, this perception of what the phone is, but the Pixel 4 isactually a little different from other Android phones because it feels like amore complete experience.
You pay for that experience though.
It's 799 for the small one with 64 gigs.
The big one is 100 bucks more.
And you have to pay 100bucks more on either one for 128 gigs of storage.
In a world where the iPhone 11 costs 699 and the OnePlus T costs600 bucks, that's a lot.
Plus, Google stopped giving out free original quality photouploads for Google Photos to Pixel users, which meansthat you're probably gonna need to start paying for aGoogle One cloud storage.
The Pixel 4 and the 4XL, they ain't cheap.
Is it worth that much money? Here's my calculus.
Face unlock is justbetter than a fingerprint because it skips the stepof having to tap a thing to get into your phone.
The voice recognition skipsa step of having to ask the Internet to figure outwhat it was you just said.
Motion sense makes the phonereact to you just a little before you even touch it.
The smooth display is just smoother.
And the camera is betterthan any other Android phone, and it matches the iPhone11 Pro in a lot of ways.
It might not be faster on paperthan other Android phones, but the Pixel 4 feels faster.
It feels more seamless.
Now there are issues.
The battery life and thevideo quality in both of them could be a lot better.
But I can tell you that Ienjoy using the Pixel more than other Android phones because all those little improvements, they really do add up.
The Pixel 4 is the bestexample yet of why specs don't tell you the whole story about whether or not an Androidphone is actually any good because the Pixel 4 is really good.